Beyond the Border
Ukrainian Strikes Against the Russian Oil Industry
James Byrne, Denys Karlovskyi, Joe Byrne, Alessio Armenzoni, Om Gothi
16 October 2025

Since early August 2025, Ukraine has executed a significant strategic pivot in its long-range strike campaign, shifting its focus to systematically degrade Russia’s energy infrastructure. While this initiative began in earnest in the summer of 2025, its origins date back to early 2024, when Ukraine’s nascent long-range strike capabilities first proved capable of threatening the Russian rear.
The timing of this initial campaign, however, was inopportune from the perspective of Kyiv's most powerful ally. As the Biden administration headed into an election year facing stubborn domestic inflation and rising energy prices, Washington reportedly privately urged the Ukrainians to desist from hitting Russian oil infrastructure. The White House feared that a successful campaign against Russian refineries would further constrict global supply, drive up prices at the pump for American consumers, and risk a wider, unpredictable retaliation from Moscow.
Source: US Energy Information Administration, Open Source Centre.
Source: US Energy Information Administration, Open Source Centre.
However, by late 2025, the geopolitical and economic landscape had changed dramatically. The global oil market, which had previously been a primary source of concern for the US administration, began to cool. Fears of a supply glut started to mount, and OPEC+, after a period of production cuts, opted instead for a series of output increases, putting further downward pressure on an already bearish oil market. In October 2025, both WTI and Brent prices were down approximately 20 percent year-on-year, with further OPEC+ production hikes on the horizon.
This new market reality, combined with the Trump administration’s growing frustration over stalled diplomatic efforts, precipitated a significant, if quiet, shift in US policy. By the summer of 2025, Washington had reportedly moved from caution to collaboration. According to reporting by the WSJ and the Financial Times, the US not only acquiesced to the Ukrainian strikes on energy infrastructure but began providing intelligence to help plan them, including crucial data to help drones evade Russian air defence systems. This support has transformed a potent Ukrainian initiative into a highly effective, coordinated campaign designed to cripple the Kremlin’s ability to finance and fuel its invasion.
Source: Telegram.
Source: Telegram.
Source: Telegram.
Source: Telegram.
Since August, the tempo of these strikes has accelerated, becoming an almost daily occurrence by October. An OSC analysis of over 90 strikes between 2 August 2025 and 13 October 2025, published alongside an analysis by Reuters, reveals that approximately two thirds are now directed against oil refineries, major pipelines, pumping stations and other Russian energy infrastructure.
Source: Open Source Centre.
Source: Open Source Centre.
So far, Ukrainian forces have relied on long-range UAVs and domestically manufactured missiles, such as the Neptune and the new 3,000-kilometre range Flamingo, a cruise missile. Faced with restrictions on the use of foreign-supplied strike assets, Ukraine has developed a range of increasingly long-range missiles and UAVs, capable of hitting targets deep behind the front line with growing accuracy and regularity.
Source: Open Source Centre.
Source: Open Source Centre.
The image below, captured in the immediate aftermath of a Ukrainian drone attack at the Feodosia sea oil terminal in the early hours of 6 October, shows multiple destroyed oil storage tanks. Local residents reported that the halo from the burning tanks was visible about 30 kilometres from the site.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Since August, however, the target set has expanded dramatically to include sea loading terminals, gas terminals, and, most critically, linear production and dispatch stations (ЛПДС), critical control nodes of major oil pipelines.
The strategic precision and cascading consequences of this campaign are exemplified by two repeated strikes on the Unecha pumping station in August 2025. This facility is not merely a section of the pipeline but a critical node regulating oil flow on the Druzhba pipeline.
Analysis by OSC indicates that the attacks likely targeted the flow-control mechanism connecting the Druzhba pipeline to the Baltic Pipeline System-2, demonstrating a surgical focus on disabling key infrastructure rather than causing indiscriminate damage.






The effect was immediate and far-reaching, leading to a halt in oil supplies to Hungary and Slovakia and prompting the Hungarian government to sanction the commander of the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) in response.
Source: Youtube (@MAGYARBIRDS)
Source: Youtube (@MAGYARBIRDS)
In a similar fashion, the Zenzevatka pumping station, which regulates flow on the Kuybyshev-Tikhoretsk pipeline, was hit on September 20 and 24. Imagery from the aftermath shows precise impact on a storage building adjacent to the underground flow-control structures, rather than the larger, more obvious storage tanks.
OSC also obtained satellite imagery taken above the Samara pumping station, which was hit by the Ukrainian forces on 20 and 23 September, showing damaged oil flow valves connecting the underground pipeline to the facilities on the base.
Apart from the damage to the pipeline structure, there is a black spot on top of one of the steel tanks likely used for operation storage.
Source: Maxar Technologies, Open Source Centre.
Source: Maxar Technologies, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Maxar Technologies, Open Source Centre.
Source: Maxar Technologies, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Meanwhile, during a 28 August attack on the Kuibyshevsky oil refinery, which Reuters reports led to a halt in operations onsite, high-resolution imagery indicates that Ukrainian strikes inflicted damage on the main refining plant. According to Reuters, Ukrainian drones damaged both primary oil refining units at the refinery: CDU (crude distillation unit)-4 and CDU-5, each with a production capacity of 70,000 barrels per day (bpd).
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Source: Airbus Defence and Space, Open Source Centre.
Change in Tactics
Ukraine's new focus is also a potentially a countermove to Russia's own adaptations. By redeploying its air defence and electronic warfare assets, Moscow had steadily blunted the strikes against its military-industrial complex.
Meanwhile, in additional attempts to counter Ukrainian strikes, Russian authorities began throttling domestic mobile networks, which can be used to help navigate drones to their targets. This has resulted in consistent mobile outages and has become an increasingly common complaint amongst Russians.
Source: Open Source Centre.
Source: Open Source Centre.
Ukraine's new focus exploits a fundamental geographic vulnerability. Russia's most critical energy facilities are sprawling complexes, concentrated in the country's west and south along the big cities and industrial centres, yet dispersed over a vast territory. This forces Moscow to protect a wide and porous economic flank.
In other instances, high-resolution images of refineries and oil facilities show the Russian authorities have started installing cages and anti-UAV nets over important equipment. For example, recent images of the Samara LPDS pumping station, which was struck by the Ukrainian drones twice in September, show that metal cages have been installed to protect oil tanks and pipelines. Elsewhere, anti-drone nets appear to have been placed over oil tanks, seemingly to little effect.


OSC analysis of satellite imagery taken over Samara LPDS (linear pumping station), which was hit twice on 20 and 23 September 2025, indicates defensive measures are being taken to protect critical infrastructure.
This image, taken in the aftermath of the second attack, clearly shows metal cages installed on the oil tanks onsite.


OSC analysis of satellite imagery taken over Samara LPDS (linear pumping station), which was hit twice on 20 and 23 September 2025, suggests the Russian industry is trying to repel the drones.
This image, taken in the aftermath of the second attack, clearly shows metal cages installed on the oil tanks onsite.
Compounding Crisis
The results of Ukraine's strategic campaign against Russia's energy sector have been immediate, severe and multifaceted. The attacks have acted as a powerful catalyst, transforming chronic, pre-existing frailties of the Russian refining industry into an acute, cascading crisis.
On 11 October, General Oleksandr Syrskyi, the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, claimed that Ukraine’s campaign had reduced Russia’s oil refining capacity by 21 per cent.
Source: Open Source Centre.
Source: Open Source Centre.
As such, Ukraine’s campaign is precipitating a domestic fuel crisis that is further weighing on an economy already beset by a growing multitude of problems. In recent weeks and months, the market has faced acute petroleum shortages, reportedly reaching an estimated 20% of national consumption in late August.
Despite fuel rationing imposed by regional governments in Crimea, Yekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk and Tyumen, fuel shortages have started to materialise. A range of social media videos and images show long queues forming on the Crimean peninsula, while an analysis by the Re:Russia think tank of trending domestic search prompts showed a dramatic 2025 increase in Russian users seeking explanations for the fuel shortages.
Source: Instagram (@chpkrym).
Source: Instagram (@chpkrym).
Source: Instagram (@chpkrym)
Source: Instagram (@chpkrym)
With Ukrainians now effectively unshackled from previous US operational constraints and a bearish global oil market offering expanded opportunity for action, the campaign to target Russia's economic centre of gravity poses a formidable problem for the leadership in Moscow. The war's direct and visible consequences are now impacting the domestic population, further compounding problems caused by sanctions and a gradually deteriorating economy.
For a country with some of the lowest historical fuel prices in the world, sharp price rises and fuel shortages will not only disrupt critical military and industrial logistics but also create palpable economic pain that the Kremlin has, until now, successfully shielded from its people.